.
Feedback

Northville Spent $25,000 on Security Issues at Former Psychiatric Hospital in 2012

Police plan to address the increase of trespassers at the Seven Mile Property.

Northville Township spent $25,948 in public safety costs from arrests and officer runs to the former Northville Psychiatric Hospital property in 2012, according to Public Safety Director John Werth.

Werth briefed the Northville Township Board of Trustees about security issues at the Seven Mile Property at its meeting Thursday night.

Werth said that in 2011, the township made 63 arrests for trespassing on the property and made 213 additional runs to the property on reports. In 2012, the township made 193 arrests, 22 of which were juveniles, and made 608 runs to the facility.

In 2012, arrests on the property cost the township $12,796, officer runs to the property cost $10,782 and department administrative costs were $2,370.

Werth called the attractiveness of trespassing on the site a "nuisance."

He said the police have tried to board up the first floor, but that the boards are always broken into the next day. He also mentioned that some residents recommend fencing in the area, but police already find the fence on the south side of the property cut through on a regular basis.

"It's been taking up our time—spending officers time who are on patrol, which is taking them from other duties of enforcement and patrolling of subdivisions," Werth said.

Werth said he has some ideas for how to keep trespassers out until the buildings can be demolished in a few years. Township Supervisor Bob Nix asked Werth to bring a list of cost-effective ideas to the next meeting, which is on Jan. 17.

"This is telling me that not only do we have a problem, but we have a problem that's continuing to grow," Nix said.

Read more:

  • Trespassing Citations at Former Northville Psychiatric Hospital Have More Than Doubled
  • Northville Township Approves $82.6 Million Park Plan for Seven Mile Property
  • Demolition of Northville Psychiatric Hospital Not Expected to Begin Until 2015
Boiling January 11, 2013 at 03:06 pm
I’m curious: Does this amount, $25,000, include revenue generated from the 35th District Court for the 193 arrests? The Police Budget has a line item for revenue from the Court in Fees, so what has the outcome of these arrests been? This article is also misleading in portraying these costs. By reading this article you could assume that if this burden did not exist then these costs would not be incurred and the taxpayers would see a reduction in the costs of running the Police Department, which is not so. Some of these costs may be incurred for overtime during court appearances, but otherwise, these are fixed costs of patrol and support services. I’d be more interested in facts that pertain to these calls and any affect that has been caused to the response times for other calls in the Township. This may be the most cost effective way of deterring vandals and trespassers!
Mark Anderson January 11, 2013 at 04:14 pm
Why even patrol the area? Seems like a waste to me...If somebody is "hurting" an abandoned building, why should I care? And if a trespasser were to get injured while on the property, well then you can respond, and the township should face no liability and the trespasser responsible for all fees incurred....
Cynthia Bullington January 11, 2013 at 07:57 pm
This report of nearly $26,000 in costs would lead one to believe that were it not for the NPH buildings taxpayers would pay $26,000 less. As far as I know Township police are paid a salary which is "spent" whether officers are responding to NPH, any other call or sitting idle. There is no mention of the fines charged convicted trespassers which somewaht offsets costs. Bottom line, I'm just not sure what this report is attempting to say.
laura January 11, 2013 at 08:52 pm
Why not charge ghost hunters/ curious trespassers a fee? Why not make it a 24-7 haunted ghost park? I would go....
Tim Wilson January 12, 2013 at 04:26 pm
Piles of dirt and tree trunks worked at another hospital (Norwich State) that was larger and had more buildings. "A" building should be a priority since it is the most dangerous and the biggest draw. Cinder blocks worked at WMU in Kalamazoo. The township is liable if someone gets hurt or killed out there. Just one lawsuit whether successful or not could cost thousands for the township to defend. Cutting all the vegetation away from the buildings would help. Take advantage of the snow if there is any to see where people are getting in at the most. Block those entrances. On spots where you do use plywood put grease around the edges to make it a nastier job to remove.
vivi February 20, 2013 at 03:30 pm
Well, if nothing else, the officers time is being diverted from other things - and potentially from township citizens - by having to babysit the psych. hospital. There is no "up" side to this...
Rick Frame February 27, 2013 at 11:54 pm
Wake up Northville! Wake up Michigan!...All you have to do is look at other states for examples on how to deal with an abandoned building... Ghosthunting is very big right now...the state, county, or whomever could make a lot of money charging for public and private ghost hunts...then you could fund your demolition and nobody goes to jail, gets fined, or gets hurt. You could clean up A building and make it reasonably safe for people. Waverly Hills Sanitorium in Louisville Kentucky charges $50 for a public hunt and $100 a head with a minimum of 10 people or the equivelent of a $1000 dollars!!!...and these places sell out their ghost hunts most times a year in advance!...Get creative Northville...it really is that simple
Rick Frame February 27, 2013 at 11:57 pm
P.S. there are also many other states who charge these standard fees for ghosthunting...too many locations to list...

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Northville Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Cori Cann June 14, 2013 at 12:19 pm
Highlight and right click to get to the URL
CG June 12, 2013 at 07:21 am
Nice job! I love how you included the children! As a parent of a child that attends TCE, as wellRead More as an educator myself, you should be proud of yourself for going over and beyond with your students! They need to see that. Great work
EBC June 9, 2013 at 03:42 pm
Joe, the closed sign was in the window because Chocolates by Renee was closed for the day. The forRead More rent sign was in the window because the space holds more then one business. The other space that the chocolate store does not occupy is available to rent.
Tracey Fors Wormsbacher June 10, 2013 at 01:41 pm
You might want to consider helping Renee's Chocolates by writing an article on their business!Read More Mistakes happen, it's all in how you respond to them. Thanks for making it right!
OnThePerch June 10, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Journo101 mistake here. Always verify a closure with the owner or valid source before publishing.Read More Mistakes like this can be incredibly costly for a small business owner. The for rent sign has been there for over a year, same with the closed sign. Spend time in your city everyone, and you'll know whats going on before you see it online!